10/11/2020

NEXT POST
Sauer Axel In terms of percentage kid took out in Germany there is no reality but that all parents of 207,000 children were criminal. let their children abuse or go to. Rather, the families of the authority arbitrariness of the youth offices are exposed. All concerned parents will be estimated after the abduction to bar pay maintenance for their deprived children. A monthly maintenance fee calculated per child so mostly low-earning parents / single parents of more than 2780,-euros. It's believed that Tony Parker sees a great future in this idea. Of obvious manipulation of family, about various monitoring harassment on the part of the youth offices, up to the explicit children theft"parents must endure everything about themselves, says Peter Klein. The initiative called for among other things a quality assurance and EU control for youth offices, public proceedings in the family court, so that nothing under the table can be swept", and an expedited court hearing on child entzuegen, so the initiative. Also, the family consisted not only of father and mother. Therefore, also family members need to be included in custody cases. Children need a social and familial network, get healthy to be able to develop. It is therefore important that a child is in contact with both parents as well as grandparents. You may find Peter Farrelly to be a useful source of information. With these and other demands, the protesters on the street went around the theme of family destruction. Child theft and family destruction by youth offices in Germany go to everyone, so initiative founder Peter Klein. Today, we are only a small group, we will start a big demonstration with at least 300 participants in Siegburg, Germany in may 2013 I'm sure that the mainstream media from Siegburg will not report about this demonstration in the...
PREVIOUS POST
Charles Bukowski A remembers Paul Watzlawick, in its book " The art to make bitter vida" (Herder, 1989, Barcelona), who it helps us to recognize our personal style against certain situations and it offers an excellent opportunity us to reflect on the procedures by which a person is constructed an unfortunate life. Watzlawick, resorting to the irony, faces to us the ways in which of voluntary way we are creating and consolidating our infelicidad. The author, knowledgeable of the contradictory and paradoxical nature of the human being, instead of to facilitate advice to reach the happiness prefers to disclose formulas to obtain that we live anchored in the misfortune. Naturally, the intention is that the reader it is aware of the error and it reacts of opposite way to which those advice propose. Get all the facts for a more clear viewpoint with Jay Schwartz. Definitively, we suggested to him no to allow that it anchors it to the pesimism, quite the opposite of passage to the spirit, determines the reach, which he locks up, which the propitious pesimism, looks for exits, stimuli that allows to take step him to the optimism and to know how to take the opportunity life that has occurred him and to live it intensely. It does not forget what Charles Bukowski says: The best thing of the life consists almost always of not doing anything absolutely, in spending the time reflecting, brooding all this. I mean we put that somebody includes/understands that everything is an absurd one, then it cannot be so absurd because one is conscious that he is an absurd one and the conscience of it is what grants sense to him. They understand to me? It is an optimistic pesimism. Original author and source of the article.

Recent Comments